{"id":2664,"date":"2011-08-10T14:22:27","date_gmt":"2011-08-10T18:22:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nanosphoto.com\/blog\/?p=2664"},"modified":"2011-08-10T14:22:27","modified_gmt":"2011-08-10T18:22:27","slug":"the-thames-river-is-dry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/the-thames-river-is-dry\/","title":{"rendered":"The Thames River is Dry"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
P&W K667 backs ethanol empties into the NECR in New London<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Change – something that’s for the better. \u00a0Despite the fact that I instinctively abhor change, I do honestly believe in that in the end it is a good thing. \u00a0But I’m not here to talk about my personal\u00a0philosophy\u00a0– but rather how change relates to the railroading world, and specifically recording railroad history. \u00a0Railroads are a dynamic beast – not only are they literally moving down the rails, but both the landscape they travel through and what they’re transporting is also constantly changing. \u00a0This post is about the latter – what is going on with what the trains themselves are carrying, and one commodity in particular, namely ethanol.<\/p>\n

If you’re a regular reader, you’re aware that the Providence & Worcester, in conjunction with the New England Central, Vermont Rail and Canadian Pacific have been moving unit trains of ethanol from the\u00a0Midwest\u00a0to the Port of Providence, RI for a customer (Motiva Enterprises – a subsidiary of Shell Oil). \u00a0I’m going to give a bit of background, just because, then I’ll get into my thoughts, and of course some photos.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
The first loaded ethanol train, on the NECR in Stafford Springs, CT<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/a>
Derailed cars from the first ethanol move in South Windham, CT<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The original routing here in southern New England for these trains was the NECR would hand the train over to the P&W at Willimantic, CT, where they’d take it east to Plainfield, CT, then north to Worcester, MA and finally southeast to Providence, RI. \u00a0Well,\u00a0unfortunately\u00a0there was a derailment on the first ethanol move over the recently reactivated P&W Willimantic Branch, prompting the FRA to classify the track as “Excepted,” effectively eliminating movement of unit hazmat trains (Federal regulations prohibit more than 5 hazmat cars per train on Excepted track – there are other restrictions too – see here for the full text of\u00a049 C.F.R. \u00a7\u00a0213.4<\/a>).<\/p>\n

So in the light of the FRA’s essential ban on ethanol moves over the Willi, the trains were instead brought by the NECR 30 miles to the south in New London, where they were then handed off to the P&W. \u00a0The P&W then had two choices – either run them back up the east bank of the Thames River, where they’d continue on their usual route north of\u00a0Plainfield, or the second option of running them directly to Providence,\u00a0utilizing\u00a0the P&W’s overhead trackage rights on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
NECR train 608 handling ethanol at Waterford, CT<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

But each of those two options had its drawbacks. \u00a0Obviously, the run up the P&W’s Norwich Branch along the Thames added about 25 miles to the trip, as well as at least one extra crew to handle the moves. \u00a0The more direct route over Amtrak was considerably shorter, but in order for the P&W to run over Amtrak, they also incurred a per car, per mile surcharge (a bit more than $1 per car per mile) to use their tracks. \u00a0The economics seemed to favor the longer route, and practice seemed to reflect that. \u00a0Most of the moves to and from New London made their way up and down the Norwich Branch between Plainfield and Groton, CT, with only a handful of weekend and nighttime moves\u00a0occurring\u00a0over Amtrak – and incurring the extra money to Amtrak.<\/p>\n

While all the ethanol was flowing along both sides of the Thames River, the P&W was hard at work rebuilding the Willimantic Branch – obviously the\u00a0preferred\u00a0route. \u00a0Prior to the derailment that sparked the FRA ban, \u00a0to open the branch back up for service the P&W did some minor upgrades – mostly filling in washouts, bridge inspections, and some tie replacement along the 15 mile or so out of service section. \u00a0With that done, the railroad moved the regular interchange point with the NECR to Willimantic, no longer running traffic to New London.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
P&W K667's empty ethanol past the USS Nautilus in Groton, CT<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

With the regular interchange – which typically can include some quite heavy loads from steel billets to road salt – now hammering across old 90 pounds per yard rail, it seemed to take its toll, and apparently resulting in the ethanol derailment in South Windham. \u00a0As an aside, only the last half dozen or so cars of the 80 car train derailed – the rest of the train made it to Providence successfully. \u00a0But because of the derailment, the P&W then set on a project to replace all of the 90 lb rail with new (as in really new from the steel mill, and not reused) and considerably heavier 115lb\/yd rail, along with replacing more ties, ballast and tamping. \u00a0During this time they’d work between runs of train NR-4X, which only ran as an as-needed extra, shuttling cars between Plainfield and Willimantic. \u00a0But towards the end, they opted to take the branch out of service to perform a blitz and finish the last few miles of track work prior to an FRA inspection.<\/p>\n

Well, now that the rail has been replaced, ties upgraded, ballast dropped and tamped the FRA did their inspection, and has given their blessing, lifting the Excepted status for the Willimantic Branch. \u00a0Sure, it’s still got some 10 MPH slow orders, but it’s up to par for hazmat shipments as far as the FRA is concerned. \u00a0What that means is that now all movements are being made between Willimantic and Plainfield, and ethanol – in addition to the regular interchange traffic – is no longer moving down to New London. \u00a0Change.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
P&W handling empty ethanol in Ledyard, CT<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Which brings me to the point of my post – if you’re a photographer, shoot what you consider to be the “everyday” whenever you can. \u00a0Some day – usually in a short enough of a time-frame\u00a0– it will change, and be gone for the foreseeable future. \u00a0And when it’s gone, you’ll be kicking yourself for not getting the shots you wanted. \u00a0And there’s a reason why I only said photographer<\/em>, and not rail photographer. \u00a0Because the crux of the story applies to any subject you photograph – be it nature, landscapes, or even our families and children. \u00a0Things change faster than we’d like to believe, and if you’d like to have more than just your memories, get a picture. \u00a0As the\u00a0cliche\u00a0goes – take a picture, it lasts longer. \u00a0Yes, I’ve covered this before in a few posts showing other things that have changed over time (click here<\/a>\u00a0or\u00a0here <\/a>for a couple examples).<\/p>\n

As far as the ethanol trains along the Thames, I can honestly say I’ve shot the hell out of these moves – from both sides of the river, as well as a few shots while on the trains themselves. \u00a0I had to have taken literally thousands of frames (and even a few of the last frames of Kodachrome I had in the freezer) of these ethanol moves. \u00a0Sure, there’s a few spots where I wish I got around to shooting at, but on the whole, I’m happy with my coverage of the various ethanol trains\u00a0running\u00a0in Southeastern Connecticut.<\/p>\n

To wrap things up, here’s a few more shots I’ve picked out from the past year or so – back when the Thames wasn’t dry (dry as in, no alcohol).<\/p>\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:113387]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114856]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114934]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:115787]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114808]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:113955]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114879]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114222]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114405]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114217]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114553]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:114212]\n[cpg_imagefixnormal:115795]\n

Please feel free to leave comments below, or drop me an email if you’d rather comment privately. \u00a0And of course, if I got anything wrong in my “backgrounder” portion, please let me know. \u00a0I never have a problem making corrections if they’re warranted.<\/p>\n

Thanks for reading and looking!
\nTom<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Change – something that’s for the better. \u00a0Despite the fact that I instinctively abhor change, I do honestly believe in that in the end it is a good thing. \u00a0But I’m not here to talk about my personal\u00a0philosophy\u00a0– but rather how change relates to the railroading world, and specifically recording railroad history. \u00a0Railroads are a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[74,2],"tags":[14,420,7,8,24],"class_list":{"0":"post-2664","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-opinion","7":"category-rail_photography","8":"tag-connecticut","9":"tag-ethanol","10":"tag-new-england-central","11":"tag-providence-worcester","12":"tag-thames-river","13":"czr-hentry"},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nanosphoto.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}